Sunday, 1 October 2017

Need-based vocabulary expansion



Some years ago a soft-skills trainer of children gave an advice to the audience to routinize the learning of five new words each day from the dictionary. The audience considered the advice as an inspiring one on the belief that the trainer had such an exercise in his life.

With much enthusiasm, for a week several children would open the dictionary daily to learn any five words as a routine. Those who learned the vocabulary as a machine couldn’t use all those words due to their inability to communicate them in the right place with the appropriate form of the words. Within a short duration, the learners identified that the advice of the trainer was not viable in their circumstances and they gradually withdrew themselves from that method of vocabulary expansion.

Though many may think that the above story is the issue of a few, there are chances for certain generalization on this attempt of vocabulary expansion in following terms;

a)     Learning of five words each without any reason is mechanical. The organism has no real need to learn those five words other than it was co-operating with the advice of the trainer or the teacher. These new words do not become active in the communication as they have no recurrence.
                                                                                                      
b)     Semantics is something greater and above than the visual of the print of a word and usually, the meaning of a word is inexplicable with other words. The semantics of a word is to be experienced with its nuances. The little comprehension of the meaning of a word in isolation do not formulate the full sense and sometimes the inner-meanings couldn't be caught by the learner, at all.

c)     Though the meaning of the root of the word could be comprehended from the machine learning of the dictionary, different forms of the same word would not be acquired with this attempt in segments.
 d)     Leaning of words in isolation is a conscious attempt of learning the language that makes the organism to repel inputs, resulting in hatred and to keeping away from learning the language.

Efforts of teachers or efforts from the part textbooks in the form of pre-teaching of vocabulary are also to be evaluated on the same count. No need to explain further demerits, the conclusion that conscious attempt of vocabulary expansion is less effective and its result is not long lasting, is not difficult to understand. It is against this context need-based vocabulary expansion is suggested as an alternative.

Image result for image of teacher and children

Who’s need?
a)     Need-based vocabulary expansion stands for developing one’s range of known words through the urgency created in use in written or spoken form. For example, the teacher has a view in her mind to teach the specific words of chirp, twitter, and caw. If she gives the meaning of these words in English or in regional language, it is direct as a well as teacher’s need to be taught, which would be easily identified by the learner.  If the teacher liked to make the situation as the need for the children to learn the new words, she would have asked the children to write a poem or a story where the children might use the specific words showing the cry of birds and animals. Tell them there are doves, hens, ducks, parrots, cats and calves as characters in the poem or story. While writing the lines of the poem or story they want specific words denoting the cry of birds or animals. Naturally, they have to approach the teacher or any other source like dictionaries, thesaurus or sites like; http://www.english-for-students.com/Cries-of-Animals-and-Birds.html and http://english-u.blogspot.in/2011/02/animal-sounds-or-cries-of-animals-birds.html

b)     Guessing the spelling of words is another method of need-based vocabulary expansion. There is a game known as ‘last first’. Let the teacher say a word, fan. What is the last letter of the word? It is ‘n’. Then say a word with the beginning letter ‘n’, nut. Let the next child say ‘table’. The turn continues like a chain. It is the requirement of the child to be in the game by contributing any word with the appropriate one required in the chain. Moreover, the child will be non-conscious and spontaneous in the utterance or writing of the word considering the beginning sound and end sound of each word. 
The urgency of the children to use the specific words in the poem or story or game depends on the anxiety deliberately made by the teacher. As there is anxiety to use the word appropriately they would make their own effort to seek the word, its pronunciation and the way in which it can be used in written or spoken form. This exercise is creative, constructive and inquisitive, above all, it is a problem-solving method where the child would be non-conscious towards the nuances of the use of the particular word as the child’s attention might be focused on finding the correct spelling, pronunciation and the form of the word to be used.  

The goal for need-based vocabulary expansion could be realized only through the planned classroom process implemented by the teacher or a skilled mentor strategies for it. Following are certain strategies that the teachers can implement;


     
Strategies for need-based vocabulary expansion

a)     Suppose the teacher is making the children to read a story in the textbook. As the beginning, she interacts with the children about the theme or message of the story. The teacher presents orally the beginning of the story and interrupts the story and asks the children whether they can guess the next immediate events in continuation of what they have heard. Let them write or say the remaining part of the story as they guess. After the presentation of two or three children, the teacher asks them “who would be right in guessing the events?” for which they would read the portion to confirm their guess.  During this reading they have to encounter certain keywords, the meaning of them are essential in proceeding reading.   In an urgency they would ask the teacher, read the glossary in the textbook or refer the entry in a dictionary or read the internet. Getting the meaning of the word becomes the real need of the child.

b)     While writing the discourses like; conversation, description, diary, news report of their own, children need new words to express their real thoughts and ideas. Suppose the teacher is taking the children to a location outside the school campus with a plan to give direct experience to describe the hill and valley. With a view to writing certain new words in the description, the teacher asks the children some questions to channel their thoughts; what are all things you see from the top of the hill? How is the weather? What all sound you hear around? What smell you feel around? What similar sight do you remember at present? Such triggers may inspire the children to write the description with specific words, for which they will ask the teacher. The teacher can provide the word which would be their urgency.

c)     Suppose the teacher demands a short speech from the child on any topic to be presented in the class, like, the merits of the mobile phone. Let the children write the speech. While they begin to write, the teacher presents certain triggers before them to channelize their thoughts to the speech; what merit will you speak first? Which is more expensive, is it the mobile phone or landline? What are other conveniences with the mobile phone? With every question, they have responses to be sequenced in the speech. To be faithful to their expression of ideas they ask for the specific terms for the preparation of the speech. After they write the speech on a sheet of paper or sequencing it in mind, let them present the speech to the audience in the class.

d)     Language games are golden opportunities to make the situation natural and non-conscious for need-based vocabulary expansion. There are several games, one is presented here. Teacher says a clue “I am saying names of 10 vegetables from my shopping list. But when I say, sound won’t come out of my mouth. You identify those words from the lip movements.” After making such preparations teacher says the words in mute, such as onion, carrot, beans … and the children attentively look at the lip movements of the teacher to write teacher’s list. They may fail with some words, but when the correct list is stated they would be more attentive to listen to the list of the teacher and to the pronunciation of each word. It is the urgency of the children to learn those words, though the words were unheard.  
      
Let teachers take this pedagogical concept of need-based vocabulary expansion as a challenge against pre-teaching of vocabulary, on an experimental basis for one year in a treatment group. Let the control group be given the older way of teaching words in advance of reading a passage. If any vocabulary test is given to both groups after one year, the teacher could convince herself the effectiveness of the need-based vocabulary development. 


Friday, 18 November 2016

Moxon’s Master

Moxon’s Master

Here is a plan for face–to-face teaching of the story, Moxon’s Master written by Ambrose Bierce, at the level, Senior Secondary and above, within three hours in three days.

Objectives of teaching the story;
1.    Students enjoy reading of the events and characters of the short story.
2.    They discuss the threat of the robots or automatic machines become uncontrollable. 
3.    They appreciate Ambrose Bierce, the author as a writer who was much ahead of his time.
Facilities and materials required for the three classes;
·       Print-out of the story/Textbook
·       Computer/LCD projector
·       Internet connectivity
·       Black Board/blank chart, chalk and marker pens

Day One

The poem ‘Science’ written by Robinson Jeffers says about the threat of robots and huge machines used by modern man.
Bigot giants, hybrids and knives are the terms he uses to denote the machines which were created by men.
Imagine an automatic machine or robot goes unmanageable or uncontrolled.
If it becomes aggressive or revengeful, what would be the consequences?
Read one news that came on 02 July 2015.   (10 mts) 
Students read the news on the monitor.
                                        

The accident happened at one of Volkswagen's production plants in Germany Photo: DPA/Alamy


Robot kills man at Volkswagen plant in Germany
A 22-year-old worker was grabbed by the robot and crushed against a metal plate
By Justin Huggler, Berlin
1:56PM BST 02 Jul 2015

A robot has killed a man at a Volkswagen car factory in Germany.
The 22-year-old worker died from injuries he sustained when he was trapped by a robotic arm and crushed against a metal plate.
The man, who has not been named, was part of a team that was setting up the automated machinery at the factory in Kassel, north of Frankfurt, according to Volkswagen.
The robot in question is a mechanical arm that moves car parts into place, said Heiko Hillwig, a spokesman for the company.
Robots weld a car body at the Audi/Volkswagen AG plant in Ingolstadt in 2010 Picture: Miguel Villagran/Getty Images
It is part of an automated assembly line that is capable of functioning without a human operator, but it is believed it may have been under human control at the time of the accident.
Mr Hillwig said he could not provide any further details as the case is now under police investigation.
Initial reports suggested human error may have been to blame, rather than a problem with the machine.
But the state prosecutor’s office in Kassel said that had not yet been confirmed.
“We have begun an investigation to find out exactly what happened and to determine whether anybody was at fault,” said Dr Götz Wied, a spokesman.
The contractor is believed to have died from injuries caused when his chest was crushed by the robot arm. He was rushed to hospital but doctors were unable to save him.
Another contractor is believed to have been present at the time of the accident, but was uninjured.
“Earlier this week a 22-year-old contractor was injured while installing some machinery in the Kassel factory,” Volkswagen said in a statement.
“He died later in hospital from his injuries and our thoughts are with his family.
“We are if course carrying out a thorough investigation into the incident and cannot comment further at this time.”
Robots have caused at least 26 workplace deaths in the US alone in the past 30 years, according to government data.
The first recorded robot-related death took place in 1971, at a Ford car production line in Michigan.
Robert Williams, an assembly line worker, was killed when a robot arm slammed into him as he was gathering parts in a storage facility.
The second known case was in Japan in 1981, when Kenji Urada, an engineer at a Kawasaki factory, was pushed into a grinding machine by a broken robot he was working on.
It later emerged he had failed to turn off the robot completely.            (10 mts)

Didn’t you read the news?
If this is news from Germany, read another story from India.





Robot kills a man in Haryana's Manesar factory
Currently reading: Robot kills a man in Haryana's Manesar factory
India TV News Desk [Updated:13 Aug 2015, 7:13:39]
Gurgaon: A 23-year-old employee of a factory in Manesar near Gurgaon died on Wednesday after receiving an electric shock when he came in contact with a robot, police said.
The victim who was at work in the welding unit with special-purpose machines and robotic welding lines, had apparently moved too close to the robot while adjusting a metal sheet that had come unstuck.
"G. Ram was working in the robot area of the SKH Metals factory when he accidentally came in contact with a robot and received an electric shock," said Kuldeep Janghu, secretary general of Maruti Udyog Kamgar Union.
The factory, located in the Tau Devi Lal Industrial Model Township in Manesar, deals with the steel requirements of automotive industries.
G. Ram, who hailed from Uttar Pradesh, was a contractual worker employed in the factory for nearly two years.
He was rushed to a hospital in Manesar but was declared dead by doctors.
"The company management and the contractor have been booked on charges of causing death due to negligence," Assistant Commissioner of Police Rajesh Kuwar told IANS.                         (10 mts)


What do you understand from the second news?
There also the robot becomes uncontrollable.
These are stories no more, they are events reported from two different countries.
Though these are unheard, such events were foreseen by the writer, Ambrose Bierce, at least a century before.   (5 mts)
Shall we read the story in its full form in your textbook, pages 3-6?

Students read the story in the classroom.
They read the glossary/dictionary or ask others for the meaning of
the new words.

Or they read the story as a home task.     (30 mts)


Day Two
Didn’t you read the story yesterday?
Let someone say the summary of the story.
            One or two say the story.
Shall I show you a summary that I got from a source? Read it;
They read from the screen or monitor.             (10 mts)



accessed on 14/11/2016)
An inventor and his friend debate the definitions of life and
intelligence. The scientist speculates as to whether a man—or plants,
or atoms—can be thought to “think,” by virtue of some aspect of their
movement (e.g., plant roots) or the ability to “co-operate” into
self-organization (e.g., crystals).   The inventor claims that
“consciousness is the creature of Rhythm.” The narrator returns to
find the inventor playing chess with what is later revealed to be an
automaton (robot).  The monster moves uncannily, with gestures that
“looks theatrical.” The friend is repulsed by the thought that the
scientist is now consorting with monsters. At the conclusion, the
inventor wins the chess game and is killed by the infuriated
automaton.






You made an attempt to read the story as well as the summary, didn’t you?
Can you write the events of the story in a sequence?
Look at the list. These are certain events of the story. 
Write the remaining events by reading the textbook once again.      (20 mts)

•       The narrator asks Moxon whether a machine can think.
•       Moxon defines ‘What is a machine?’
•       ………………………………
•       The narrator debates with Moxon.
•       ……………………………..
•       ……………………………..
•       ……………………………..
•       ……………………………..
•       ……………………………...
•       Moxon returns from his ‘machine shop’.
•       The narrator notices the skin is torn showing blood on the cheek of Moxon.
•       Moxon defines Life.
•       The narrator returns home that day.
•       …………………………………………..
•       …………………………………………..
•       …………………………………………..
•       Next night the narrator notices that Moxon plays chess with ‘someone.’
•       The narrator understood the antagonist was a machine (automation)
•       …………………………………………
•       ………………………………………..
•       The machine became furious, overturned the table, and candle.
•       ………………………………………..
•       ………………………………………..
•       Moxon was flattened by the machine.
•       Seeing the scene of Moxon’s murder the narrator fainted down.
•       When the narrator came back after three days’ hospitalization,
Haley, the confidential workman told that Moxon’ body had been buried.
•       The narrator thanks Haley for saving him from the attack of the machine.





They make an attempt to fill in the blanks (12 nos) individually and
after that, they compare their list with that of others. 
When they dictate the teacher writes the events, thus a common list of events is made.    (30 mts)
Day Three
Teacher writes the statement on the Board; 
‘Moxon’s Master is a story about the threats that humans encounter
when they create robots or superior machines. ‘
Is there any threat like that?
What’s your view?
 Examine the statement on the background of the story ‘Moxon’s Master’.

Ambrose Bierce was a writer with prophetic views on the mishap created
by automation of machines.  Wasn’t he?
What are your suggestions for checking the menace of the mishap
created by automation?   (10 mts)
Two or three speak.
The story is rich with dramatic moments/twists. 
Explain any one and write why you do like that event.    (20 mts)

Moxon’s  Master is one of the first robot stories in world literature.
Have you heard about any other stories in which the robot or machine is a character?
They say two or three stories.
Have you heard of any film dealing the theme of the story, Moxon’s  Master?
What crucial question does the writer ask the readers through the story?
a)    The machine has no flesh and blood. But man has. What makes the man emotional or sensational to the environment?
b)    If becomes uncontrollable or unmanageable, who is more aggressive, man or machine?                              (30 mts)

Assessment task
Read the following news came on 2 December 2014.
( Courtesy to:  http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30290540 accessed on 18/11/2016)
 
HAL 2001

Media caption Stephen Hawking: "Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete and would be superseded"
Prof Stephen Hawking, one of Britain's pre-eminent scientists, has said that efforts to create thinking machines pose a threat to our very existence.
He told the BBC:"The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race."
His warning came in response to a question about a revamp of the technology he uses to communicate, which involves a basic form of AI.
But others are less gloomy about AI's prospects.
The theoretical physicist, who has the motor neurone disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), is using a new system developed by Intel to speak.
Machine learning experts from the British company Swiftkey were also involved in its creation. Their technology, already employed as a smartphone keyboard app, learns how the professor thinks and suggests the words he might want to use next.
Prof Hawking says the primitive forms of artificial intelligence developed so far have already proved very useful, but he fears the consequences of creating something that can match or surpass humans.

What does Prof Hawking warn? 
He has warned that machines that function on artificial intelligence will have own decisions and desires. Hawking expresses his concern that how far the thinking pattern of the machines would match with human intelligence. 
If so what peril is awaited from these machines in the future, including industry and economy of nations?