Friday, 18 November 2016

Moxon’s Master

Moxon’s Master

Here is a plan for face–to-face teaching of the story, Moxon’s Master written by Ambrose Bierce, at the level, Senior Secondary and above, within three hours in three days.

Objectives of teaching the story;
1.    Students enjoy reading of the events and characters of the short story.
2.    They discuss the threat of the robots or automatic machines become uncontrollable. 
3.    They appreciate Ambrose Bierce, the author as a writer who was much ahead of his time.
Facilities and materials required for the three classes;
·       Print-out of the story/Textbook
·       Computer/LCD projector
·       Internet connectivity
·       Black Board/blank chart, chalk and marker pens

Day One

The poem ‘Science’ written by Robinson Jeffers says about the threat of robots and huge machines used by modern man.
Bigot giants, hybrids and knives are the terms he uses to denote the machines which were created by men.
Imagine an automatic machine or robot goes unmanageable or uncontrolled.
If it becomes aggressive or revengeful, what would be the consequences?
Read one news that came on 02 July 2015.   (10 mts) 
Students read the news on the monitor.
                                        

The accident happened at one of Volkswagen's production plants in Germany Photo: DPA/Alamy


Robot kills man at Volkswagen plant in Germany
A 22-year-old worker was grabbed by the robot and crushed against a metal plate
By Justin Huggler, Berlin
1:56PM BST 02 Jul 2015

A robot has killed a man at a Volkswagen car factory in Germany.
The 22-year-old worker died from injuries he sustained when he was trapped by a robotic arm and crushed against a metal plate.
The man, who has not been named, was part of a team that was setting up the automated machinery at the factory in Kassel, north of Frankfurt, according to Volkswagen.
The robot in question is a mechanical arm that moves car parts into place, said Heiko Hillwig, a spokesman for the company.
Robots weld a car body at the Audi/Volkswagen AG plant in Ingolstadt in 2010 Picture: Miguel Villagran/Getty Images
It is part of an automated assembly line that is capable of functioning without a human operator, but it is believed it may have been under human control at the time of the accident.
Mr Hillwig said he could not provide any further details as the case is now under police investigation.
Initial reports suggested human error may have been to blame, rather than a problem with the machine.
But the state prosecutor’s office in Kassel said that had not yet been confirmed.
“We have begun an investigation to find out exactly what happened and to determine whether anybody was at fault,” said Dr Götz Wied, a spokesman.
The contractor is believed to have died from injuries caused when his chest was crushed by the robot arm. He was rushed to hospital but doctors were unable to save him.
Another contractor is believed to have been present at the time of the accident, but was uninjured.
“Earlier this week a 22-year-old contractor was injured while installing some machinery in the Kassel factory,” Volkswagen said in a statement.
“He died later in hospital from his injuries and our thoughts are with his family.
“We are if course carrying out a thorough investigation into the incident and cannot comment further at this time.”
Robots have caused at least 26 workplace deaths in the US alone in the past 30 years, according to government data.
The first recorded robot-related death took place in 1971, at a Ford car production line in Michigan.
Robert Williams, an assembly line worker, was killed when a robot arm slammed into him as he was gathering parts in a storage facility.
The second known case was in Japan in 1981, when Kenji Urada, an engineer at a Kawasaki factory, was pushed into a grinding machine by a broken robot he was working on.
It later emerged he had failed to turn off the robot completely.            (10 mts)

Didn’t you read the news?
If this is news from Germany, read another story from India.





Robot kills a man in Haryana's Manesar factory
Currently reading: Robot kills a man in Haryana's Manesar factory
India TV News Desk [Updated:13 Aug 2015, 7:13:39]
Gurgaon: A 23-year-old employee of a factory in Manesar near Gurgaon died on Wednesday after receiving an electric shock when he came in contact with a robot, police said.
The victim who was at work in the welding unit with special-purpose machines and robotic welding lines, had apparently moved too close to the robot while adjusting a metal sheet that had come unstuck.
"G. Ram was working in the robot area of the SKH Metals factory when he accidentally came in contact with a robot and received an electric shock," said Kuldeep Janghu, secretary general of Maruti Udyog Kamgar Union.
The factory, located in the Tau Devi Lal Industrial Model Township in Manesar, deals with the steel requirements of automotive industries.
G. Ram, who hailed from Uttar Pradesh, was a contractual worker employed in the factory for nearly two years.
He was rushed to a hospital in Manesar but was declared dead by doctors.
"The company management and the contractor have been booked on charges of causing death due to negligence," Assistant Commissioner of Police Rajesh Kuwar told IANS.                         (10 mts)


What do you understand from the second news?
There also the robot becomes uncontrollable.
These are stories no more, they are events reported from two different countries.
Though these are unheard, such events were foreseen by the writer, Ambrose Bierce, at least a century before.   (5 mts)
Shall we read the story in its full form in your textbook, pages 3-6?

Students read the story in the classroom.
They read the glossary/dictionary or ask others for the meaning of
the new words.

Or they read the story as a home task.     (30 mts)


Day Two
Didn’t you read the story yesterday?
Let someone say the summary of the story.
            One or two say the story.
Shall I show you a summary that I got from a source? Read it;
They read from the screen or monitor.             (10 mts)



accessed on 14/11/2016)
An inventor and his friend debate the definitions of life and
intelligence. The scientist speculates as to whether a man—or plants,
or atoms—can be thought to “think,” by virtue of some aspect of their
movement (e.g., plant roots) or the ability to “co-operate” into
self-organization (e.g., crystals).   The inventor claims that
“consciousness is the creature of Rhythm.” The narrator returns to
find the inventor playing chess with what is later revealed to be an
automaton (robot).  The monster moves uncannily, with gestures that
“looks theatrical.” The friend is repulsed by the thought that the
scientist is now consorting with monsters. At the conclusion, the
inventor wins the chess game and is killed by the infuriated
automaton.






You made an attempt to read the story as well as the summary, didn’t you?
Can you write the events of the story in a sequence?
Look at the list. These are certain events of the story. 
Write the remaining events by reading the textbook once again.      (20 mts)

•       The narrator asks Moxon whether a machine can think.
•       Moxon defines ‘What is a machine?’
•       ………………………………
•       The narrator debates with Moxon.
•       ……………………………..
•       ……………………………..
•       ……………………………..
•       ……………………………..
•       ……………………………...
•       Moxon returns from his ‘machine shop’.
•       The narrator notices the skin is torn showing blood on the cheek of Moxon.
•       Moxon defines Life.
•       The narrator returns home that day.
•       …………………………………………..
•       …………………………………………..
•       …………………………………………..
•       Next night the narrator notices that Moxon plays chess with ‘someone.’
•       The narrator understood the antagonist was a machine (automation)
•       …………………………………………
•       ………………………………………..
•       The machine became furious, overturned the table, and candle.
•       ………………………………………..
•       ………………………………………..
•       Moxon was flattened by the machine.
•       Seeing the scene of Moxon’s murder the narrator fainted down.
•       When the narrator came back after three days’ hospitalization,
Haley, the confidential workman told that Moxon’ body had been buried.
•       The narrator thanks Haley for saving him from the attack of the machine.





They make an attempt to fill in the blanks (12 nos) individually and
after that, they compare their list with that of others. 
When they dictate the teacher writes the events, thus a common list of events is made.    (30 mts)
Day Three
Teacher writes the statement on the Board; 
‘Moxon’s Master is a story about the threats that humans encounter
when they create robots or superior machines. ‘
Is there any threat like that?
What’s your view?
 Examine the statement on the background of the story ‘Moxon’s Master’.

Ambrose Bierce was a writer with prophetic views on the mishap created
by automation of machines.  Wasn’t he?
What are your suggestions for checking the menace of the mishap
created by automation?   (10 mts)
Two or three speak.
The story is rich with dramatic moments/twists. 
Explain any one and write why you do like that event.    (20 mts)

Moxon’s  Master is one of the first robot stories in world literature.
Have you heard about any other stories in which the robot or machine is a character?
They say two or three stories.
Have you heard of any film dealing the theme of the story, Moxon’s  Master?
What crucial question does the writer ask the readers through the story?
a)    The machine has no flesh and blood. But man has. What makes the man emotional or sensational to the environment?
b)    If becomes uncontrollable or unmanageable, who is more aggressive, man or machine?                              (30 mts)

Assessment task
Read the following news came on 2 December 2014.
( Courtesy to:  http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30290540 accessed on 18/11/2016)
 
HAL 2001

Media caption Stephen Hawking: "Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete and would be superseded"
Prof Stephen Hawking, one of Britain's pre-eminent scientists, has said that efforts to create thinking machines pose a threat to our very existence.
He told the BBC:"The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race."
His warning came in response to a question about a revamp of the technology he uses to communicate, which involves a basic form of AI.
But others are less gloomy about AI's prospects.
The theoretical physicist, who has the motor neurone disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), is using a new system developed by Intel to speak.
Machine learning experts from the British company Swiftkey were also involved in its creation. Their technology, already employed as a smartphone keyboard app, learns how the professor thinks and suggests the words he might want to use next.
Prof Hawking says the primitive forms of artificial intelligence developed so far have already proved very useful, but he fears the consequences of creating something that can match or surpass humans.

What does Prof Hawking warn? 
He has warned that machines that function on artificial intelligence will have own decisions and desires. Hawking expresses his concern that how far the thinking pattern of the machines would match with human intelligence. 
If so what peril is awaited from these machines in the future, including industry and economy of nations? 


Wednesday, 3 August 2016

The Last Conservative (Robinson Jeffers)
                    
The poem ‘The Last Conservative’, written by Robinson Jeffers has been prescribed for the students of Senior Secondary or Undergraduate programmes in several countries.
Here is a plan for teaching the poem within three hours in face-to-face mode.
The plan for the assessment of the learning of the poem has also been presented.

1.   Plan for teaching the poem


Following are the objectives of the teaching of the poem;

a)    Students comprehend the poem through silent reading.
b)    They analyse the poem from the viewpoint of one who closely observes the environment.
c)     They make an attempt to trace out the philosophies of Robinson Jeffers, which are reflected in the poem.
d)    They identify the message of the poem.



Robinson Jeffers

 (photo credit:https://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poet/robinson-jeffers}
1.1 Day one (first hour)

You are all of 19-20 years old, aren’t you?
But as a child in class three or four you happened to see a place.
Suppose, that was a place where there were a few houses, buildings and roads.
After several years, say, recently you visit the place.

To your surprise you notice so many new constructions there.
Trees and plants had been cut.
New roads and market places have been built.
The face of the earth has been changed.
You feel some unfamiliarity.
Does any such experience come to your mind?
If so, shall we make an attempt to draw both the scenes?


Divide a blank page of your note book into two; A and B.
Below A, you draw the previous sight of the place.
Under B, you draw the present scene of the place.
            Students draw the pictures as suggested by the teacher.

After you draw both, you are writing a description on the changes happened.
Also recall the thoughts when you noticed the changes appeared there.
           
            Students write the description as suggested by the teacher.
            Two or three students show the pictures and read out their descriptions to the whole class.
            ……………………………………………
Anybody else can also present the self-thoughts that you have written.
……………………………………………

Good, you share your nostalgia also.
There is a poem in your textbook titled ‘The Last Conservative’.
Read the poem.
It shares some sadness that was caused by remembering something from the past.
          They read the poem silently.
          They use the glossary and/or dictionary to overcome barriers of unfamiliar words.


1.2 Day two (second hour)

The poem is seen to be autobiographical.
Certain events in his life are implied in the poem?
What are the events referred here?
            Students read the poem and write the list of events.
            (Following can be certain events that they may write)
            Teacher shows the chart.
           
a)    Poet builds his own house near the seashore.
b)    He and his love live there.
c)     Poet enjoys the life there, where he felt aloofness from the society.
d)    Surroundings are changed a lot.
e)    His dearest has died.
f)      The sea has no change at all.




(Photo credit: https://www.google.co.in/search?q=hawk+tower+tor+house)

You understand the location where the poet was living in his twin-house, Tor House and Hawk Tower, aren’t you.
Look, one is Tor House and the other one is Hawk ‘Tower’.
Can you draw the houses and the natural settings around?
They are detailed in the first stanza of the poem.
Read the poem and draw.
            They read the poem and draw the picture detailed in the first stanza.
            ………………………………………………..
            Two or three show the pictures and read out the description.

The second stanza says about the sadness, as well as his dissatisfaction.
Write a list of thoughts that shows poet’s sadness or dissatisfaction.
            After two or three random presentations   teacher presents the chart;

a)    The environment deteriorates like a rotting apple
b)    Streets are built around his house
c)     People use cars and they have obsession of cars
d)    His dearest has died

Though things around him have changed, there are certain things not yet changed.
Please read the last five lines of the poem.
Those are the things not yet changed, what are they?
Write a list of things that have not changed.
           
After two or three random presentations   teacher presents the chart;

a)    The ocean (Carmel Bay )
b)    The forest haunted by squirrels.
c)     The quail running on the low roof’s worn cedar shingles.

1. 3 Day three (third hour)

Jeffers coined the word inhumanism, the belief that mankind is too self-centred and too indifferent to the astonishing beauty of the environment.

What is the evidence in favour of the above statement that you can trace out from the poem?

They read the last stanza and analyse it.
Do you find any expression of the poet that shows that mankind is too self-centred and too indifferent to the astonishing beauty of things?
            They make an attempt to copy down such expressions from the second stanza.
            After their attempt teacher shows the following chart.
a)    They have built streets around us, new houses.
b)    Cars obsess them.

Read the following lines;
All that we saw or heard was beautiful
And hardly human.

The location where the poet lived with his love was beautiful.
But it was not human.
What does it mean ‘not human’?
            Students interpret the expression ‘not human’ in the way they like.
            ………………………………………

Yes, this expression shows that this beauty had been created by the nature herself.
Rock, wind, sea, moonlight, mountain coyote, doe, fawn etc. were gifted by the nature.
They had a ‘wild’ look, wild beauty.
The nature was maiden, virgin.


‘The Last Conservative’ is another poem of Jeffers that implicate his passion towards stone.
This poem is said to be the ‘poetry in stone.’
What are the references of stone in the lyric?
            They read the poem from beginning to the end.
            Following can be their possible responses;

a)    outcrop boulders  (first line of the poem)
b)    we built our houses (means, Tor House and Hawk Tower, both in Gothic style and made of stone, the outer walls were bare, not plastered)
c)     squatting beside the stones to see the ghosts of Indians (6th and 7th lines of the poem)
d)    rock, wind and sea were in the surrounding (9th line)

                                                                                                              

2.    Plan for assessment of learning of the poem

2.1 Assessment task one (30 minutes)

Look at the title of the poem, it is ‘The Last Conservative’.
Conservative means, one, who is resistant to change or no progressive.
Does the poet feel that he himself is a conservative?
He is against the development which is upsets the order of the nature.
Civil constructions or developmental activities are beneficial for men.
If the constructions and developmental activates are not carried out, it may affect the well-being of the human community in a place.
One who speaks against the well-being of the human community is an opponent of development.
But, Jeffers is a proponent of the freedom of the humans as well as animals.
He is one who demands to reject the thought that ‘self’ is all.
This poet is rarest of all poets who also practised a reasonable detachment as a rule of conduct, instead of love, hate, and envy.
The poet stands for the beauty of the nature on the expense of development.
Is the poet marching backward?
Is he a conservative, adamant to changes?
If yes, write YES.
If no, write NO.
Write your arguments for your YES or NO.
………………………..
            They write their arguments in favour of their response YES or NO.
            After the completion of writing the arguments, they involve in a debate. 
            Teacher anchors this debate keeping neutrality.
            Teacher provokes them wherever necessary to make a heated debate.

Indicators for the assessment of the script of the arguments (100 words);
a)    Relevance of the arguments to the poser (question):  1/2/3/4/5
b)    Attempts to substantiate the arguments with examples from the poem:
1/2/3/4/5
c)     Appropriateness of the language: 1/2/3/4/5


2.2 Assessment task two (30 minutes)

The Wikipedia entry says as follows about Robinson Jeffers;
…. Jeffers was largely critical of the US policies including the entry into the World War II. He was largely been marginalized in the mainstream academic community…
But after his death in 1962, Jeffers continues to be a formidable presence even in 2016.

His utterances are reverberating. What are the questions that the poet poses to the world nations on the need of changing from man to not-man? Explain.

Indicators for the assessment of the script of the answer (100 words);

a)    Arguments in favour of detachment towards certain human nature:  1/2/3/4/5
b)    Attempts to substantiate the advocacy towards protecting environment as the need of the hour: 1/2/3/4/5
c)     Appropriateness of the language: 1/2/3/4/5

2.3 Assessment task three (30 minutes)
Write short answers for the following questions, in 50 words.
a)    Based on the themes of the poem ‘The Last Conservative’, how far Jeffers is a peace poet?
b)    Jeffers called on humans to "uncentre" themselves. What is his suggestion to ‘uncentre’ discussed in the poem?

Indicators for the assessment of the script of the answers;
c)     Arguments in favour of the proposition:  1/2/3/4/5
d)    Attempts to substantiate the suggestion: 1/2/3/4/5
e)    Appropriateness of the language: 1/2/3/4/5